Home
About JUCEE/Mission
FAQ
Newsletter
JUCEE Staff
JUCEE Events
JUCEE Calendar
Participating Organizations
Resource Sites







JUCEE Publications
How to Get Involved
Jobs & Internships

Contact Us

(Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5)

Series: Understanding the Japanese Nonprofit Sector (1)
"Hello, Imai-san, You're Not the Only One"

by Katsuji Imata President / CEO

Series: Understanding the Japanese Nonprofit Sector (2) Whose Interest is "Public Interest"?
by Katsuji Imata President / CEO

Bridging Common Causes: Research and Activism on Homelessness in Japan and the U.S.
Interview with Matthew Marr
Ph.D. Candidate in Sociology at UCLA

by Scott Sugiura
FCP Senior Program Associate


Working Toward Common Goals:
U.S.-Japan Collaborations

Interview with Elissa Leif
Director of Asia-Pacific Development, Children's Express

by Akiko Yuda, Outreach Coordinator







Series: Understanding the Japanese Nonprofit Sector (1)
"Hello, Imai-san, You're Not the Only One"

by Katsuji Imata, Executive Director


In late January, Mr. Takashi Imai, the Chairman of Federation of Economic Organizations (keidanren), the most well-known corporate federation in Japan, said at an economic forum in Switzerland that he did not understand whose interest NGOs (non-governmental organizations) represent. In the backdrop was the WTO Conference in Seattle in November, where a large presence and powerful protest of NGOs led to the falling apart of the Conference. For Mr. Imai, NGOs must be a collection of disruptive entities that prevent a new global economy from prospering.

His remarks were strongly criticized by U.S. and European corporate representatives at the forum. Also, since he was in a position that could represent the whole Japanese corporate sector, Japanese press reported the story as a tale of another Japanese leader who lacks the understanding of internationally accepted norms -- this time, the role of NGOs in the new world economy. Basically, he was laughed at.

Poor Imai-san, because I think he just doesn't get it, and nobody was really answering his question. For example, an Asahi Shimbun reporter wrote in response to this question, "as civil society matures, new values and needs also emerge; people thus become less and less satisfied with an undifferentiated set of social and other services commonly provided by the government and corporations Ēc That's where nonprofits come in." (February 6, 2000) If I were Imai-san, I would say, "But I just wanted to know who they represent!"

In other words, he is questioning the legitimacy of the nonprofit sector. Why should voices and opinions of a small number of people who say they are NGOs carry any weight in an international setting, for example? If a U.S. President and a Japanese prime minister agree on something, it's an agreement between two nation-states, and as a representative of Japan's private for-profit sector he should not only listen to it but abide by the new rules. But what is the basis that makes him listen to the voice of NGOs as legitimate bodies?

Yes, he can be laughed at easily. Especially in the past few years, the Japanese press has been reporting the value of nonprofit organizations and you see the term "NPO" very frequently in Japanese newspapers. NPOs are important, NPOs can play a major role in the society, NPOs will bring an alternative way of doing things, etc. So it's very easy to jump on the bandwagon and take for granted why NPOs are good. But for Mr. Imai and for many others, some important questions are still left unanswered.

This is a snapshot of Japan's nonprofit sector today. Since the passing of "the NPO law" in 1998 which allowed for the incorporation of nonprofit entities, there still exist doubts, misunderstandings and simple, innocent questions among citizens in Japan. With this series, we bring you to Japan and to the excitement that is developing over the role of the nonprofit sector both in Japan and in a global society.








Series: Understanding the Japanese Nonprofit Sector (2) Whose Interest is "Public Interest"?
by Katsuji Imata President / CEO

The translation of "public interest," koeki, is a tricky word in the Japanese lexicon. You would imagine that public interest is public interest. But in Japan, whose traditional nonprofit sector has been serving a supplementary role to the government, koeki usually carries the flavor of "government interest."
Take koeki hojin (public interest corporations), for example. It is a form of nonprofit organizations which were created under the Article 34 of Civil Code, enacted back in 1896. When people in Japan see the word koeki hojin in newspapers these days, it is typically about mismanagement, improper use of funds, lack of transparency or some kind of collusion with government. Since public interest corporations are heavily regulated by the government, we generally tend to have the view that they are only quasi-governmental bodies or outposts of government interest. This is contrary to recent research which found that about 72 percent of public interest corporations are "private initiative" type while 28 percent are "substitute of governmental functions." (Chikio Hayashi and Akira Iriyama, Koeki Hojin no Jitsuzo, Diamond-sha, 1997, p. 62) Probably because the image of public interest corporations has been quite tarnished by the mass media, those which were started by private initiative have to fight the uphill battle to prove that they are indeed formed by private, not-for-profit, voluntary endeavors.
In 1998, the Japanese Diet passed the Law to Promote Specified Nonprofit Activities. This law opened the door for grassroots or community-based groups to be incorporated as nonprofit corporations. Despite the lack of meaningful tax advantages, as of this July 28, 2,290 organizations became incorporated under the new law (the English outline of the law is provided in Japan's Economic Planning Agency's homepage at http://www.epa.go.jp/98/c/19980319c-npo-e.html). Before this law took effect, these smaller organizations would not have thought about incorporating themselves, because of very high asset requirement and/or tight regulatory oversight. Many citizens' groups pushed for the legislation of this new corporate status.
In this process, many from those citizens' groups expressed their dislike of the word koeki, again because they did not want to be associated with its implications towards government interest. They did not want to see the word in the text of the law. In the end, however, the word "public interest" was included in the purpose section of the law.
When the 1998 Law was passed, there was a mention in the addendum that the Diet will revisit the tax issue for these nonprofit corporations in two years. Since the Law took effect on December 1, 1998, it will be two years at the end of November this year. That is why we hear a lot about providing tax advantages to these organizations these days. In particular, giving tax deductions to donors is considered to be a big issue, since it is expected to boost private donations to nonprofit organizations.
Yet, it is not correct to assume that this will be a totally new system in Japan. There is in fact a tax deduction system for donors. Not many people in Japan know this because it is not utilized enough. Also, as you can imagine by now, it is very hard to obtain this special status. As of 1996, only about 17,000 nonprofit organizations qualify for this status, as compared to about 600,000 501c3 organizations in the U.S. in 1994 which have the similar tax advantages including tax deduction for donors. How an organization qualifies for this status is not clear, except for some sets of organizations that belong to a specific status such as social welfare corporations and private school corporations. The general rule for the qualification is "those which significantly contribute to the promotion of public interest."
There you go, we see the word koeki again. And of course, the government gets to decide who indeed "significantly contributes to the promotion of koeki." Are you getting tired of this word by now? Then you know how people in the nonprofit sector in Japan feelĒc







Bridging Common Causes: Research and Activism on Homelessness in Japan and the U.S.
Interview with Matthew Marr
Ph.D. Candidate in Sociology at UCLA

by Scott Sugiura
FCP Senior Program Associate

Matt Marr, NPOP 1999, recently co-authored a report on day labor and homelessness in Tokyo. After reading the report I spoke to Matt to get an understanding of how Japan and the U.S. compare regarding homelessness and day labor and what nonprofits are doing to address the problem. While participating in the NPOP program Matt interned at Sanyu-kai, a homeless and day laborer support organization in the San'ya district of Tokyo. NPOP gives Americans the chance to work in a Japanese nonprofit through a 1.5 month internship and gain first hand knowledge about issues and the nonprofit sector in Japan. Prior to his internship Matt set-up a comparative research project on day labor in Tokyo and L.A. with Professor Abel Valenzuela from UCLA's Center for the Study of Urban Poverty. His study is part of a larger research project comparing day labor in Los Angeles and Tokyo.
Though Matt had worked extensively with homeless populations in the US and some in Japan as well he had not conducted research on this scale in Japan before. "I stayed on for a while after June to conduct a survey of day laborers in San'ya. I didn't think I'd be able to get people to respond given that we had to survey while laborers were looking for work on the streets from 5 AM to ensure that we sampled day laborers actively seeking work and not discouraged workers. With the help of some volunteers and the kindness of the laborers who responded, we were able to pull it off."
Part of what made Matt's data collection so successful was the close relationships he developed with the volunteers and day labor community in San'ya, he is also fluent in Japanese. He surveyed 119 day laborers in the yoseba, or day labor ghetto, in San'ya. "Responses from workers in our sample paint a grim picture of day labor in San'ya, which is enduring a prolonged recession. This market is ridden with unemployment and homelessness and only able to meet the employment needs of a select few laborersĒcStructural barriers, mostly age discrimination and the lack of available jobs, prevent day laborers from obtaining full-time employment or even semi-consistent employment in day labor."
Historically, homelessness in Japan has been equated with day labor. Currently about 70% of the homeless in Tokyo are day laborers who have not recently had work and have fallen into homelessness. The remaining 30% are beginning to look more like homeless populations in the U.S., including women and those individuals who have never engaged in day labor. There is a need for housing and employment services among Japan's homeless and day laborers. Matt noted that "there are probably less than 100 beds provided (for the homeless) by nonprofits throughout Japan, while L.A. county has between 14,000 and 15,000 on any given day." While these numbers speak to the difference in scale between homeless populations in the U.S. and Japan it also highlights the resources available to address homelessness. Matt estimates that Tokyo's homeless population increased by approximately 2,000 people over the past year - an increase of 30%.
Despite growing similarities to the U.S., Japanese organizations dealing with homelessness and day labor face very different circumstances compared with their U.S. counterparts. For example, Matt has worked at Shelter Partnership in Los Angeles as an intermediary between private and government funding and about 300 service delivery organizations. In Japan there are far fewer organizations, little infrastructure, and almost no funds to pay for the services provided by nonprofits. Among the 30 to 40 organizations working with the homeless in Tokyo, most raise funds through individual contributions - many from the congregations of local churches. These funds are often insufficient to cover expenses for rice and other basic needs provided to the homeless. Sanyu-kai has managed to maintain a stable funding stream by Japanese standards in part through its connection to the non-Japanese community in Japan.
Although Japanese nonprofits working with the homeless face numerous challenges, Matt hopes that government and business can work to increase labor available to help day laborers earn enough to stabilize their living situation and prevent them from slipping into homelessness. Matt also sees less competition between Japanese nonprofit homeless organizations, in part because there are fewer resources to compete over. As a result there is more potential for collaboration between groups than in the U.S. In the U.S., the services and organizations created to address issues of homelessness have become largely institutionalized to the point where the root causes of homelessness are no longer the primary focus. The scale of the problem has become so large that infrastructure and many organizations focus more on numbers served in a homeless population that has essentially become a permanent fixture in the demographics of the U.S. Matt and many Japanese homeless activists see this as something that Japanese organizations and the government can and should avoid before the scale and complexity of the problems in Japan increase.
Matt's future research will focus on raising awareness in both countries about the need for durable solutions to homelessness and will hopefully bring community activists and researchers of poverty to a better understanding of the global patterns of homelessness and day labor. Matt is currently working on a Ph.D. in sociology at UCLA while he continues to work at the Center for the Study of Urban Poverty. If you'd like more information on Matt's research you may contact him at m_marr@hotmail.com.







Working Toward Common Goals:
U.S.-Japan Collaborations
Interview with Elissa Leif
Director of Asia-Pacific Development, Children's Express

by Akiko Yuda, Outreach Coordinator

When I started working for JUCEE back in the fall of 1998, Elissa Leif, then the Program Director at JUCEE, was preparing to move back to the East Coast after three years of working with JUCEE. Elissa speaks, reads and writes Japanese. In the U.S. nonprofit sector, she is considered a unique professional who understands Japanese culture and society.
Elissa discovered Japan when she was selected to participate in the Japan-America Student Conference in 1987 while at Yale University. "I was always interested in the role of education in society, and that was one of the topics of the Conference," Elissa recalls. In 1988, she returned to the Conference as an American Executive Committee member. Following that, she took up Japanese for the first time to learn more about the Japanese education system and culture.
After obtaining a Master's Degree in Comparative Education at Harvard University, she went to Japan to continue her research. While in Tokyo, she was hired by the National Federation of UNESCO Associations in Japan (NFUAJ) as one of the managers of its World Terakoya [literally "temple school"] Movement, a program supporting grass-roots literacy activities of local NGOs in developing countries while educating people in Japan on literacy issues. While she was inspired by NFUAJ's mission and the many NGOs throughout the world with which she came into contact, she became increasingly aware that Japanese nonprofits needed to acquire management skills to make their greatest possible contribution.
Elissa returned to the U.S. to launch JUCEE with Katsuji Imata, the Executive Director of JUCEE, in 1995. In her role as Program Director, Elissa developed the vision of the Fellowships Creating Partnerships (FCP) program which brings together U.S. and Japanese organizations to collaborate on projects of joint concern. It was out of her experience running JUCEE's internship programs that she realized that some U.S. organizations wanted to work with Japanese organizations "in a more significant way" than hosting interns. Elissa notes that for organizations to think about collaboration before FCP "there were huge financial, structural, language and cultural obstacles to making this collaboration happen." She knew already from her work in Japan that Japanese nonprofits were interested in U.S. nonprofit management techniques and thought that a Japanese-U.S. nonprofit collaboration program would provide a way for organizations on both sides of the Pacific to "grow in a much larger way through working together intimately and sharing a common vision."
Luckily for JUCEE, Elissa continued as a consultant for the FCP program while she was in Washington, D.C. and now works with Children's Express (CE), one of the 3 U.S. organizations involved in the FCP program. As part of her job, she works closely with CE's Japanese partner organization, Network for the Convention on the Rights of the Child (NCRC), through the FCP program. They are working together to integrate youth voices into the annual NCRC Forums and the broader society in Japan and to assess the viability and lay the foundation for establishing a CE news bureau in Tokyo, thus amplifying the voices of children through the adult media.
When asked why Japan-U.S. relations, Elissa sees these two particular cultures as "so different and subject so easily to misunderstandings." Nonprofit collaboration, however, provides a chance to remedy this, she feels, because "people share a vision that goes beyond profit or national interest to what people really believe in or feel passionate about as human beings."



 

JUCEE Core Programs:
(IP)Japan-U.S. Nonprofit Internship Program
Program Structure>Program Updates>Download Brochure
(NPOP)Nichibei Pathfinding Opportunity Program
Program Structure>Program Updates>Download Brochure
(FCP)Fellowships Creating Partnerships Program
Program Structure>Program Updates

JUCEE Alumni